Case studiesCross-Industry Automation & AI WorkflowsFour countries5 Production Deployments

Every one of these was a bottleneck where hiring was too slow and a custom build was too heavy. Five production systems across four countries, from document extraction to a self-hosted voice agent, each on its own 2–4 day sprint.

5
Deployments
Across four countries
2–4 Days
Sprint length
Kickoff to working production flow
80%
Peak workload cut
Mortgage back-office processing
99.9%
Reliability
Automated retry and alerting
What a sprint hands overone execution
Triggerwebhook / schedule
Interpretmodel
Guardvalidate
Commitwrite
Notifyreply
Retrybackoff

The first pass fails the guard on purpose — a run that never fails is not worth showing. The dashed path is the retry loop.

01How fast, and how

Hover a phase to see what happens in it, or a lane to see how far that one had to go.

0h24h48h72h96h
What a sprint is made of

Hover a phase to see what happens in it, or a lane below to see how far that engagement had to go.

  • Mortgage lenderNorth America
    within the 2–4 day band
  • Property managerNew York City
    within the 2–4 day band
  • Skin clinicCanada
    in production · 48h
  • Insurance brokerIndia
    in production · 48h
  • Travel-tech operatorGulf
    in production · 96h
Off this axis entirely:hiring for it — too slowbuilding it custom — too heavy

The phase band is our method, not a shared calendar — these five ran independently, each through its own sprint. Two carry no stated duration and are drawn as dashed bars rather than given a length.

02Why a sprint

The record is explicit about what a sprint was chosen over, and why.

Hire for itToo slow to reach the bottleneck
Build it customToo heavy for the problem
A dedicated sprintSized to the actual bottleneck, live in 2–4 days
04Five proofs

Five different mechanisms, each keeping the colour it has in the chart above — and what shipped, stated plainly, not as a diagram.

The bottleneckEvery loan file arrived as a stack of documents that a person had to open, identify, read and re-type.

Loan file arrives, unopened
Pages, classified as they are read
  • Application
  • Income
  • Property
  • Disclosures
Fields extracted, then type-checked
  • Borrower
  • Property
  • Income
  • Liabilities
  • Term
What we delivered

A pipeline that reads every incoming file, pulls the right fields out, checks them, and writes clean records straight into the system of record — no manual re-typing.

80% manual workload automated
Same toolkit every time
  • n8n Enterprise
  • Node.js
  • PostgreSQL
  • Webhooks
  • WhatsApp Cloud API
  • OpenAI
  • Anthropic
05Where the model acts

Across all five, a model only ever turns something unstructured into something structured. Nothing it returns reaches a system of record unchecked.

A model interpretsTurns something unstructured into something structured. That is all.
  • Identify a document
  • Pull fields out of it
  • Read a written enquiry
  • Understand speech
Everything it returns is checked herenothing crosses on trust
Code decides and commitsDeterministic, reviewable, and the only side that can change anything.
  • Type-check what came back
  • Diff against what is known
  • Call the system of record
  • Decide what happens next
  • Reply on the original channel
Hover a step to see where it came from:Mortgage lenderProperty managerSkin clinicInsurance brokerTravel-tech operator
06When a step fails

Most of these flows depend on a legacy portal that offers no webhook and no uptime promise. Watch one fail and self-heal.

Run log · one scheduled jobrunning
  1. Trigger fires
  2. Fetch from legacy portaldid not drop the job
  3. Retry, backing offwaiting longer
  4. Retry, backing off furtherwaiting longer
  5. Succeeded
  6. Written downstream

The mechanism is real; the backoff intervals shown are illustrative.

  • Automated retryA failed call backs off and runs again rather than dropping the job.
  • Real-time alertingA run that exhausts its retries raises an alert instead of failing silently.
  • Error telemetryEvery step reports, so a broken portal is visible before a client notices.
07Outcomes
2–4 Days
Kickoff to a working production flow

Every proof on this page was a bottleneck where hiring was too slow and a custom build was too heavy. A sprint is what fits between those two.

  • Mortgage lender (North America)
  • Property manager (New York City)
  • Skin clinic (Canada)
  • Insurance broker (India)
  • Travel-tech operator (Gulf)
80%
Peak workload cut
Mortgage lender back-office document processing.
99.9%
Reliability
Automated retry and alerting across every deployed flow.
5 Cases
Deployed
Across four countries, in production.
2 People
Per pod
Dedicated automation pods, not a shared queue.

Each operator is described by sector and region rather than by name, so publishing never waits on a client's sign-off. The figures are unchanged either way — our delivery record is independently verifiable on Upwork.

Automation Sprints Capabilities

What our 2-person automation pods build in 2–4 days.

  • n8n Enterprise workflow and API orchestration
  • Legacy portal scraping where no webhook exists
  • WhatsApp Cloud API lead and quoting pipelines
  • Document classification and optical field extraction
  • Self-hosted LLM feasibility POCs (Mistral / LLaMA)
  • Exponential retry, dead-letter recovery, and telemetry alerting

Got a manual back-office bottleneck or an unintegrated legacy portal? We deploy dedicated pods in 48 hours.

Book an automation scoping sprint